[14344] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: test Nets being routed?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Carter)
Tue Dec 23 20:09:27 1997
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 17:55:19 -0700
From: Steve Carter <scarter@genuity.net>
To: "Matthew D. Lammers" <lammers@zeus.netset.com>
CC: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@merit.edu
I also sent this particular route to the bit bucket (Null0) at NAP.NET having not
hear back from inc.net.....
-Steve.
Matthew D. Lammers wrote:
> The issue from our side has been fixed...I have word that "default" has been
> killed off. Also, noteworthy, that since we weren't getting these routes via
> BGP, filters didn't do much.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Matt.
>
> Randy Bush wrote a while back:
> <
> < > and 192.0.0.0/24
> < > or 128.0.0.0/24
> < > or 191.255.255.0/24
> < >
> < > these prefixes (and delegation points) are valid or potentially valid
> < > in the routing system
> <
> < and someday, with enough marketing thrust, pigs could fly. with as many
> < large isps filering these prefixes as there seem to be, and for good
> < historic reason, my advice would be to bet on the pigs. rosenantes is
> < getting nackered.
> <
> < and once again, what the heck is a 'delegation point' in bgp/routing?
> < rfc/document reference, please?
> <
> < randy
> <
> <
>
> --
> Matthew D. Lammers -- NetSet Internet Solutions, Inc.
> http://www.netset.com/
