[143354] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Aug 7 11:41:28 2011
To: Graham Wooden <graham@g-rock.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT."
<CA6402F1.3BDB7%graham@g-rock.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:39:31 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1312731571_38980P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said:
> I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
> thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
> accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...
"they don't accept communities"??!? Just... wow. ;)
(That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell
reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part
about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on
your head...)
--==_Exmh_1312731571_38980P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFOPrGzcC3lWbTT17ARAgRZAJ4nq4rOC3C4csLoAanWoav75GNBnwCdGjyt
M8mYA9GQ7fqcU23x3yUmbmY=
=9RDo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1312731571_38980P--
