[143286] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FTTH CPE landscape

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Aug 5 11:36:44 2011

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E3C099B.6010404@ispalliance.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Helms" <khelms@ispalliance.net>

> Again, you're not in any way shape or form representative. IPSEC IS
> less than 1% for residential Internet customers in the US and its not
> even 30% for business accounts. I have visibility into access networks
> around North America which gives me a sample size that is far larger
> than required for statistical significance.

Which is fine, but it does *not* justify not putting the check on the 
tick-list.  You merely assign it a lower weight.  "Whether to do it" is
a cost-benefit analysis.  "Not checking to see if you can have it for free"
is malpractice.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post