[143286] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FTTH CPE landscape
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Aug 5 11:36:44 2011
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E3C099B.6010404@ispalliance.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Helms" <khelms@ispalliance.net>
> Again, you're not in any way shape or form representative. IPSEC IS
> less than 1% for residential Internet customers in the US and its not
> even 30% for business accounts. I have visibility into access networks
> around North America which gives me a sample size that is far larger
> than required for statistical significance.
Which is fine, but it does *not* justify not putting the check on the
tick-list. You merely assign it a lower weight. "Whether to do it" is
a cost-benefit analysis. "Not checking to see if you can have it for free"
is malpractice.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274