[143147] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Graydon)
Sat Jul 30 20:57:10 2011
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:56:59 -1000
From: Paul Graydon <paul@paulgraydon.co.uk>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4E34A2EA.10306@sorbs.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 7/30/2011 2:33 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Ken Chase wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 02:57:12PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan said:
>>
>> >Ok I'll accept that reference..I must admit I didn't know that RFC/STD
>> >existed so I learnt something today. ;-)
>>
>> That's pretty rich.
>>
>> You enforce people to adopt standards that are part of proposed RFC's, not
>> official by any standard, jump through 18 other hoops, and still won't
>> delist them because some bit in their named replies is the wrong number of
>> electronvolts on your wire, and then claim you dont know an RFC?
>>
>> p.k.b.
>>
>> /kc
>>
> What's the current RFC/BCP and STDs count? I'm sure you remember at
> least 95% of them by heart and can recite them word for word, just like
> me..!
>
Whilst you have a reasonable point, and there are a fair number of them
to keep track of, you are providing a service based around a subset of
them. Would you not agree that it would be reasonable to assume that
you (or your product designers) would know and understand all the
standards appropriate to your product, and are ensuring your own compliance?
Paul
