[143047] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Jul 26 19:57:26 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34181275C86B58@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:47:24 -0700
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 26, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> You wrote:
>>> Also, one can argue that a dynamic prefix facilitates privacy =8A
>>=20
>> In Germany, there is significant political pushback against the idea =
to
>> give residential mom+pop static prefixed for that very reason.
>=20
> Do German web sites not track users with cookies, then?
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Leo
No, it's just a case of the German government not being very smart about
privacy.
Owen
