[143040] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Hite)
Tue Jul 26 18:41:14 2011
In-Reply-To: <20110726195417.GA20045@netmeister.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:40:30 -0700
From: Matt Hite <lists@beatmixed.com>
To: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi, Jan. It's a great presentation and I really love your approach.
However, I am curious -- why was IP-in-IP not pursued? I know the
presentation mentioned the MTU issue, but your final solution seemed
full of enough pitfalls itself (ie -- lots of cooperation from
numerous groups, people, and processes) that raising MTU in your
network might be an easier proposition. Thought you might have went
into it a bit in the video, that's all. Any insight?
-M
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> w=
rote:
> Matt Hite <lists@beatmixed.com> wrote:
>> Might someone have the video for this presentation in their personal sta=
sh?
>>
>> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Monday/NANOG51.Talk4=
5.nanog51-Schaumann.pdf
>
> I don't have the video handy, but there really wasn't all that much more
> info in the presentation than in the slides. =A0It might be worth noting
> that the modules are now open source:
> https://github.com/yahoo/l3dsr
>
> If you have questions, just email me.
>
> -Jan
>
