[142962] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 32 and directallocate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Hills)
Sat Jul 23 04:29:17 2011
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Chris Hills <chaz@chaz6.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:27:53 +0100
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
In-Reply-To: <4E24EF43.8010001@2mbit.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 19/07/2011 03:43, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 7/18/11 7:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have the following questions. hope you can help
>>
>> 1/ In ipv6 /32. ls it same as ipv4 /32
>
> No.
It depends how you define it. If you mean the number of bits in the
network mask, then yes it is the same. If it is the size of the network,
then it is not the same.
_____
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
