[142900] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (FRLinux)
Mon Jul 18 07:13:51 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAEAFGYiWk=rC4rAVpHOnHvVaEBCp4w=BiBuS060bhKYJXPVGUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:32 +0100
From: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>
To: James Harr <james.harr@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, James Harr <james.harr@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you really really need address obfuscation, you can still do NAT,
> but NAT from public addresses to public a public address or pool of
Well,
You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7),
see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a
default.
Steph
_____
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
