[142877] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NDP DoS attack
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sun Jul 17 05:36:07 2011
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
In-Reply-To: <87bowtl13m.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In practice, the IPv4 vs IPv6 difference is that some vendors provide
> DHCP snooping, private VLANs and unicast flood protection in IPv4 land,
> which seems to provide a scalable way to build Ethernet networks with
> address validation---but there is nothing comparable for IPv6 right now,
> from any vendor.
That is not true. Check out work and reports from the IETF SAVI WG. There
are actually quite a few implementations out there, being used in
production.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
_____
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
