[142818] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Jul 13 23:49:52 2011
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:49:09 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <694FAD67-F4D3-4C85-8215-377A8B96DE91@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I also view RFC6296 as a perpetuation of the clear violation of the
> end-to-end principle (i.e., ' . . . functions placed at low levels of
> a system may be redundant or of little value when compared with the
> cost of providing them at that low level . . .') embodied in the
> abomination of NAT/PAT into IPv6, and the consequent instantiation of
> yet more unnecessary and harmful state into networks which are already
> deep in the throes of autogenic thromboembolism.
great rant. not to quibble but i thought 6296 was stateless.
randy
