[142803] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Brim)
Wed Jul 13 11:26:21 2011
In-Reply-To: <5F86D723-D959-4AC2-9472-27B9B8658E14@cisco.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:22:21 -0400
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:09, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> I think ILNP is a great solution. My concern with it is that the needed changes to TCP and UDP are not likely to happen.
I guess I should clarify: I think ILNP is elegant. But the real
Internet evolves incrementally, and only as needed. Other
trajectories are much more likely.
