[142790] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (-Hammer-)
Wed Jul 13 10:04:45 2011
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:04:30 -0500
From: -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com>
To: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAAwwbUNj6zR2OSf+D09B+O269zdKvXsOOjgowe=jso1Qt1Qjw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Good response Jimmy. I think that peoples tact more than anything is
what is embarrassing about these threads. The complaint is legitimate.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 07/12/2011 09:05 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, -Hammer-<bhmccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The tolerance of some of you out there is amazing. You must be PS3 users
>> crying because your free game network is down. Maybe we can get a
>>
> PS3net users had a right to cry.. because their 'free' game network
> is not really free,
> and they bought a nice console that became a brick for indefinite
> amounts of time....
>
>
>> Be patient people. Maybe a little appreciation to these experts wouldn't
>> hurt you either.
>>
> Patience is gold, but operating or migrating a listserv is not rocket science,
> and it cuts both ways. Only a certain amount of patience is warranted for any
> particular situation, and it appears posters have the warranted amount
> of tolerance.
>
> For now I am appreciative of Robert Bonomi and Brielle Bruns for
> identifying issues.
>
> I'll be happy to express appreciation, as soon as the "experts" get it
> done and get
> it right; right now I'm just keeping my fingers crossed and hoping to
> hear the news
> that the issues are addressed and everything's perfect.
>
> In the mean time; I am glad that the deficiencies witnessed are being reported.
> And hope the experts are learning, and at least taking the reports seriously,
> esp. regards to non-member posting, spam, "undisclosed-recipients" mess,
> and header issues/ oddball "bulk_mailer" identification...
>
>
> NANOG as an operators list should not itself become an example of poor
> operator practice; or poor planning/change management;
> that would be an embarassment.
>
>
>> -Hammer-
>>
> --
> -JH
>
