[142766] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Tue Jul 12 22:06:50 2011
In-Reply-To: <4E1C758A.10604@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:05:53 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> The tolerance of some of you out there is amazing. You must be PS3 users
> crying because your free game network is down. Maybe we can get a
PS3net users had a right to cry.. because their 'free' game network
is not really free,
and they bought a nice console that became a brick for indefinite
amounts of time....
> Be patient people. Maybe a little appreciation to these experts wouldn't
> hurt you either.
Patience is gold, but operating or migrating a listserv is not rocket science,
and it cuts both ways. Only a certain amount of patience is warranted for any
particular situation, and it appears posters have the warranted amount
of tolerance.
For now I am appreciative of Robert Bonomi and Brielle Bruns for
identifying issues.
I'll be happy to express appreciation, as soon as the "experts" get it
done and get
it right; right now I'm just keeping my fingers crossed and hoping to
hear the news
that the issues are addressed and everything's perfect.
In the mean time; I am glad that the deficiencies witnessed are being reported.
And hope the experts are learning, and at least taking the reports seriously,
esp. regards to non-member posting, spam, "undisclosed-recipients" mess,
and header issues/ oddball "bulk_mailer" identification...
NANOG as an operators list should not itself become an example of poor
operator practice; or poor planning/change management;
that would be an embarassment.
> -Hammer-
--
-JH
