[142742] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Carleton)
Tue Jul 12 12:33:49 2011
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:25:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Ben Carleton" <ben@bencarleton.com>
To: "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
In-Reply-To: <1154063.1343.1310487228300.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Right, you should, because we are back on s0 (server zero?) and mailman. Th=
e headers were being suppressed by the AMSL servers, which are running that=
strange "bulk_mailer 1.13" software. If you inspect the headers for any of=
the messages that were forwarded to us from that server (the one that star=
ted the thread called "NANOG List Update - Moving Forward" from Michael K S=
mith, for example), you will see that the headers are being stripped...=0A=
=0A--bc=0A=0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink=
.com>=0ASent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:13pm=0ATo: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org=
>=0ASubject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward=0A=0A----- Original Mes=
sage -----=0A> From: "Ben Carleton" <ben@bencarleton.com>=0A=0A> * The mail=
ing list is stripping out all Received: headers from prior=0A> to the messa=
ge hitting the listserver=0A=0AYou're the third person to report that, but =
*I* am seeing incoming Received=0Aheaders in my messages here -- yours, for=
example, has them all, even prior=0Ato the message hitting s0.=0A=0AGreat =
name, there, BTW. "s0".=0A=0ACheers,=0A-- jra=0A-- =0AJay R. Ashworth =
Baylink jra@baylink.com=0ADesigner =
The Things I Think RFC 2100=0AAshworth=
& Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII=0ASt=
Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 127=
4=0A=0A
