[142727] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spam?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler James R)
Tue Jul 12 11:46:52 2011
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.vyihdmrewjyiia@osprey>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:45:29 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Thomas Donnelly wrote:
> I received no spam, and had I received 2 pieces, it may have been =
slightly irritating.
>=20
> What is irritating is the sheer number of people complaining about it. =
Can we stop please? I think they get it.
>=20
> -=3DTom
>=20
Tom, you are one of the lucky ones -- I have received over two dozen =
SPAM via NANOG in the last 24 hours.
And, yes, it would be gratifying to know why the change - is the new =
configuration less expensive? (to the list manager, not us, obviously)
Also, where is the reply to header?
James R. Cutler
james.cutler@consultant.com
