[142465] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fwd: Service Provider Route Flap Damping Deployment Status Survey
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shishio Tsuchiya)
Mon Jun 27 04:31:20 2011
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:31:08 +0900
From: Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4DDA2CF1.40100@cisco.com>
Cc: draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey@tools.ietf.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dear NANOG
We really appreciate response to the survey.
We could get 63 response from global operators groups.
And we had published result of the survey as internet-draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02
We would like to refer the survey result to improve vender implementation.
Q2.Do you use Route Flap Damping ?
YES:13,NO:49
Q3.If you select No on Q2,why?
Do not have the need:10
Did not know about the feature:5
No benefits expected:10
Customer would complain:5
Because I read RIPE-379:15
Other:6
Q4.If you select Yes on Q2,what parameter do you use?
Default Parameter:6
RIPE-178:1
RIPE-210:0
RIPE-229:1
Other:7
Q5.Do you know Randy Bush et. al's report ''Route Flap Damping Considered Usable?''
YES:33
NO:29
Q6.IOS's max-penalty is currently limited to 20K.
Do you need this limitation to be relaxed to over 50K?
YES:24
NO:32
Q7.According to [draft-ymbk-rfd-usable],Suppress Threshold should
be set to 6K.Do you think the default value on implementations should be changed to 6K?
YES:17
NO:18
Q8.If you have any comments, please fill this box.
Please see the draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02#section-3.8.2
Best Regards,
-Shishio
