[142442] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: What do you think about the Juniper MX line?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Howard Hart)
Sun Jun 26 01:04:14 2011

From: Howard Hart <Howard.Hart@ooma.com>
To: Ryan Finnesey <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:03:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <6EFFEFBAC68377459A2E972105C759EC03C1AA97@EXVBE005-2.exch005intermedia.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


We have a couple installed as our edge routers.

Pluses -  solid as a rock, easy to administer, and will take some extremely=
 high packet rates for relatively low cost (important for us since we use t=
hem for VoIP traffic). If you're approaching the capacity of a 1GB uplink, =
I highly recommend these as your first step to 10 GB.

Minuses - careful on your MX80 version. The MX80-48T includes a built in 48=
 port 1 GigE switch, but we've had compatibility issues with it and other v=
endors switches. The modular version that replaces the MX80-48T costs quite=
 a bit more, but it does give you a lot more connection and compatibility o=
ptions.

Howard Hart

On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:37 PM, "Ryan Finnesey" <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestme=
nts.com> wrote:

> I would love to know the same I am looking at the MX line as well for a
> new network build-out=20
>=20
> Cheers
> Ryan
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris [mailto:behrnetworks@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:29 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: What do you think about the Juniper MX line?
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I've been doing some research into using the MX line of Juniper routers
> and was interested in hearing people's experiences (the good, bad, and
> ugly). What do you like about them? What do you dislike?
> Where are you putting them in your network? Where are you not putting
> them? Why? What other platforms would you consider and why? I hope to
> hear some candid responses, but feel free to respond privately if you
> need to.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
>=20


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post