[142258] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George B.)
Mon Jun 20 13:10:05 2011
In-Reply-To: <-2211765233669277754@unknownmsgid>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:09:17 -0700
From: "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>
>> internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you=
don't have some redundancy. =A0Nothing works all the time forever.
>
> I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other
> upstreams to reach the Internet redundantly.
>
> -cjp
>
Well, they aren't someone you can take a default route from (either
ipv4 or ipv6), that's for sure. So yeah, could use them if taking
full routes.
