[142249] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Address Assignment Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Mon Jun 20 11:07:34 2011
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:07:27 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4DFF60C4.2020603@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:01:24AM -0700, JC Dill wrot=
e:
> I would use this answer in reply to the customer, and ask them to=20
> (specifically) justify their request for the discontiguous blocks.
Or, just don't offer it. Make them fit in one block, giving them
3 months to renumber into a single, larger block if necessary.
It sends a strong message you're willing to give them all the space
they need, but won't help them evade RBL's.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)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=Hd6I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--
