[142196] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Mon Jun 20 00:41:08 2011
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:01:39 -1000."
<1BC921A3-C4CD-4FFF-9AE5-49C1218D5191@virtualized.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:39:59 +1000
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <1BC921A3-C4CD-4FFF-9AE5-49C1218D5191@virtualized.org>, David Conrad
writes:
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >> I would guess that most of these are going to be purchased simply to
> >> prevent someone else from getting them
> > I would agree with this part.
>
> I suspect you underestimate the desires and power of marketing folks at =
> larger organizations.
>
> > Adding gtlds and opening up the root to brands effectively requires
> > TM holders to register/bid to protect their TM rights. =20
>
> Not really. You might want to search on "trademark" in =
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf. =
> There has been a tremendous amount of traffic on that particular issue =
> and that is reflected in the Applicant Guidebook.
>
> > It will be even
> > more interesting if ICANN looses and has to roll back brand =
> delegations
> > it has made.
>
> Really, if you're going to opine on the disasters that will befall ICANN =
> as a result of the new gTLD program, you might want to actually read =
> what that program does and doesn't do. Really.
>
> Regards,
> -drc
I'm curious how anyone that has not signed a agreement with ICANN
can be bound to anything in any applicant guide book. Also
rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf basically deals with <tm>.<gtld>. on a
brief skimming not <tm> or is ICANN going to have a sunrise period
for "."?
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
