[142187] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Sun Jun 19 23:01:11 2011
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:22:46 MST."
<4DFEAEF6.70407@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:00:09 +1000
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <4DFEAEF6.70407@mtcc.com>, Michael Thomas writes:
> Isn't this problem self regulating? If sufficient things break
> with a single label, people will stop making themselves
> effectively unreachable, right?
The failure rate isn't going to be high enough for natural selection
to take effect. Remember the protocols we use were designed to
work back when there was only a single flat namespace. Simple
hostnames will appear to work fine for 99.999% of people. It's
just when you get namespace collisions that there will be problems.
Unfortunately the nincompoops that decide to use tlds this way don't
have to pay the costs of cleaning up the mess they cause.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
