[142099] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Fri Jun 17 22:14:55 2011
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <23892D49-AD8A-4B16-B2A9-49D356CEC3AD@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:13:00 -1000
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I really don't think that namespace issues are part of the role for =
the ASO AC.
Why do you think there is an ASO?
> This is clearly a problem for ICANN's disaster-ridden domain-name =
side, and not
> for the ASO/NRO side of things.
Because there is clearly no inter-relation between domains and address =
and the
operation of the Internet.
> Operationally, it's a horrible idea, but,
> most of us in layers 1-4 stopped paying much attention to the =
disasters happening
> at ICANN for DNS along time ago as we sort of came to believe that we =
didn't have
> enough money to bribe^h^h^h^h^hinfluence the right people in a =
sufficiently
> meaningful way to make our voices heard.
Aren't you one of the folks who state that if you don't participate in =
PPML then
you have no reason to criticize ARIN policies?
Regards,
-drc
