[142061] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Fri Jun 17 17:54:01 2011
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <60CD072E-8323-4CC0-A060-00A89990A0B2@virtualized.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:54:59 -0500
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:21 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> Aw, Jeezus.
>>=20
>> No. Just, no.
>>=20
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/06/17/202245/
>=20
> You just learned about this now?
On a related topic, the US DoJ recently wrote a letter suggesting that =
DNS registry/registrar vertical integration might not be a good idea =
(from an anti-trust perspective).
=
http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-dengate-thrush-16jun1=
1-en.pdf
Cheers,
-Benson
