[141813] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Question about migrating to IPv6 with multiple upstreams.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Reath)
Sun Jun 12 00:08:47 2011
In-Reply-To: <006d01cc28b3$957128e0$c0537aa0$@net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:08:42 -0500
From: "Matthew Reath" <matt@mattreath.com>
To: "Rob V" <rob@ipninja.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew Reath [mailto:matt@mattreath.com]
>> Sent: June-11-11 11:22 PM
>> To: Randy Carpenter
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Question about migrating to IPv6 with multiple upstreams.
>>
>> Standard IP routing, the default gateway of the network can decide based
>> on a route entry whether to send it to the cable modem or send it to the
>> firewall.
>
> If the source block is not routed via both connections it won't work
> without
> NAT. I had this same problem trying to use my ISP's native v6 over PPPoE
> and maintain a tunnel as backup since it was still pretty flaky as they
> were
> testing it at the time ... no way a residential ISP is going to route 3rd
> party blocks for all their customers, and no chance the tunnel provider
> was
> going to route the block my ISP assigned me either ... with no NAT66 in
> Tomato/ddWRT/etc it was 100% impossible to have multiple connections ...
>
>
Are you able to create ip6ip tunnels from your firewall/router to each
customer?
--
Matt Reath
CCIE #27316 (SP)
matt@mattreath.com | http://mattreath.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mpreath
