[141728] in North American Network Operators' Group
IPv6 Week (was Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Jun 10 16:46:05 2011
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=yX8pRV4RHrVwc9T1fudfUjjkwLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:45:19 -0400
To: Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
My thoughts are that we need either a week or a 36-48 hour period. I =
thought this before the events of last week.
I am very happy with the results and that based on the public statements =
so far (Looking forward to hearing what is presented at NANOG on this as =
well) that it was viewed as "didn't break much" by the major players.
This affirms to me what we've observed for many years. Having IPv6 =
enabled doesn't break "much", and not in a way that is any more broken =
by the issues you can observe in networks otherwise.
- Jared
On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
> So should monthly IPv6 day be the same week as Microsoft Patch =
Tuesday? :-)
