[141599] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: World IPv6 Only Day.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Thu Jun 9 12:57:02 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <2EA1DD65-21CC-492D-B150-4C0943F216A9@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:55:25 -0700
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
yes
http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dmld+snooping+switch
On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 9 jun 2011, at 6:36, Karl Auer wrote:
>=20
>> Well, a modern switch should work fine, even if not directly IPv6 =
aware,
>> but it won't understand multicast and will generally flood multicast
>> frames to all interfaces. So definitely stipulate IPv6 capability, =
even
>> for switches....
>=20
> Are there any switches out there that do MLDP snooping to avoid =
flooding IPv6 multicasts?
>=20
>=20
>=20
