[141582] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 day non-participants
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wes Hardaker)
Thu Jun 9 09:34:41 2011
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns61@hardakers.net>
To: James Harr <james.harr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 06:34:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim9Hh+PQ4+AcCBjqbBEqEHe439YhrzROAhC=XLQ40v1pQ@mail.gmail.com>
(James Harr's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:59:41 -0500")
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:59:41 -0500, James Harr <james.harr@gmail.com> said:
JH> I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
JH> they very publicly put on their home page that they would. So I
JH> queried the IPv6 day participation list to see who didn't have AAAA's
JH> for their listed website. It turned out to be around 9.5%
IMHO, it's worse than that. Most sites only added a AAAA record for
their website, and frequently didn't for their DNS server. So they
weren't *really* doing a complete IPv6 test, IMHO.
I actually ended up documenting my full results of testing for a number
of things (including DNSSEC, just because I could) at:
http://pontifications.hardakers.net/computers/celebrating-world-ipv6-day-by-testing-the-candidates/
--
Wes Hardaker
My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/
My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
