[141502] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent & HE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (manny)
Wed Jun 8 16:03:09 2011
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:01:56 -0400
From: manny <mhernand1@comcast.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1139995622-1307562524-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-510085940-@b11.c14.bise6.blackberry>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 6/8/11 3:48 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> Has been going on for a long while now. HE even made a cake for Cogent (IIRC), to no avail.
>
> But, this is not surprising. A lot of public/major peering issues with v4 over the past few years has been cogent vs. someone else.
>
> Brielle
> ------Original Message------
> From: Dennis Burgess
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Cogent & HE
> Sent: Jun 8, 2011 1:43 PM
>
> Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
> and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
>
> Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
> NOT peer IPv6 peer with anyone else!
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
You get what you pay for with Cogent.... YMMV
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN79U0AAoJEOcnyWxdB1Iro1IIAKxSFxPFbzQ3oTGwr6FR6MQ1
KIf0plsRJstmWmhygvXAwC3C9PUlBlaPqEc+KcI1frrMHNGb1fSmmQLRsxdQ22XX
KIrIHhaYf9W/03twyp5iVNmZLcYKLkDO8SvaW4K0z0KRbMrrIgCkvOeekE28hz7n
q/HTOpvvx+A1npS+wbvl3siIfrUSeXNVOhMm1/noA/VboFbaIhRQmRFh6ypHeZWg
u7hk32DsotWlzJOocSbDda3+MPF4HCCWCN8tKC2WMUybaz2Wp/YRMUeca4fkckmk
w37RVkuglrA3DwhfM+DihOQXoXYRFLMhiT4qb3+uwveolhyPA8q2YOdgLUo+qXA=
=h0uX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
