[141500] in North American Network Operators' Group
re: Cogent & HE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Olsen)
Wed Jun 8 15:58:42 2011
From: "Nick Olsen" <nick@flhsi.com>
To: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess@linktechs.net>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:55:42 -0400
Reply-To: nick@flhsi.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Correct, The only way around this currently is to peer with both cogent and
HE.
If you have cogent, You can 6to4 w/BGP with HE. I would consider that just
a patch for the problem. I would do it just for the reachablility.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
----------------------------------------
From: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess@linktechs.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:45 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cogent & HE
Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
NOT peer IPv6 peer with anyone else!
Dennis
