[141452] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Millnert)
Wed Jun 8 10:22:21 2011
In-Reply-To: <6ac5bc37$45ab67ae$73965090$@com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:17:39 -0400
From: Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com>
To: nick@flhsi.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Nick,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nick Olsen <nick@flhsi.com> wrote:
> I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent.
(snip)
> Any things to be aware of before
> pulling the trigger on it? (Other then them not having connectivity to HE's
> IPv6 side of things, Wish they would fix that already...)
Not just HE's prefixes you miss with Cogent.
Lack of full table means they can't be considered a full transit, ie,
you need something like minimum 2 full transits + cogent to do v6
properly. They're more like a private peering.
Cheers,
Martin