[141434] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Wed Jun 8 08:50:59 2011
In-Reply-To: <D35BF4D1-4C0E-412B-9F1C-2EE1CE064AB7@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:47:32 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
>
>> Owen,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
>>> combined constraints:
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01. =A0 =A0 =A0No more IPv4 addresses to give to customer=
s.
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02. =A0 =A0 =A0No ability to deploy those customers on IP=
v6.
>>
>> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4. =A0Insufficient amount
>> of IPv4 addresses =3D> LSN required.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>
> No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't
> need LSN.
>
> The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you=
can't
> deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4.
>
>
cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...
Cameron
> Owen
>
>
>
