[141282] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 proof of life
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Tue Jun 7 07:48:00 2011
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:47:12 +0300
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0C9E36A9@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sometimes more than 25% of the traffic in our webserver is v6
http://lacnic.net/v6stat/hour_access_log_counter.png
http://lacnic.net/v6stat/hour_access_log_counter.txt
Haven't time to check the details about URLs, countries, =
user-agents but I am working on it.
Regards,
.as
On 7 Jun 2011, at 08:47, George Bonser wrote:
>>=20
>> There was some additional research done by Geoff Houston indicating
>> that if you exposed tunnel capable hosts (that were able to reach =
IPv6
>> literals) you had something closer to 20% IPv6 connectivity.
>>=20
>> I'm already excited about traffic levels and patterns in less than 24
>> hours. Will be interesting to observe.
>>=20
>> - Jared
>>=20
>> See if you can reach this even if you don't have native IPv6...
>>=20
>> http://[2001:418:3f4::5]/
>=20
> I am seeing about 33% of our DNS traffic from one server over v6 but
> admittedly a lot of this is to the root servers that return A records
> for various domains. But the number of domains with v6 capable DNS
> servers is rising.
>=20
>=20
