[141272] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 proof of life
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Chown)
Tue Jun 7 03:03:10 2011
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <sdy61ewbev.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:02:06 +0100
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 7 Jun 2011, at 04:47, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:56:32 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> =
said:
>=20
> PV> it's been a while since i looked at the query stream still hitting
> PV> importantly and happily, there's a great deal of IPv6 happening
> PV> here.
>=20
> Which is reaffirming what many have said for a while: it'll be the
> server-to-server traffic that will first peak. It's just going to =
take
> the client-server relationships years to catch up. Every time I look =
at
> my maillogs I've found there is quite a bit of v6 happening. But the
> web logs show almost nothing.
Other way around here... pushing 2% external web traffic by IPv6, but =
only about 0.2% of mail traffic, and that would be lower if some of our =
users weren't on various IETF mail lists.
Tim
