[141256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 proof of life
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Mon Jun 6 23:51:48 2011
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <sdy61ewbev.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:50:37 -0400
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns61@hardakers.net>
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:56:32 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> =
said:
>=20
> PV> it's been a while since i looked at the query stream still hitting
> PV> importantly and happily, there's a great deal of IPv6 happening
> PV> here.
>=20
> Which is reaffirming what many have said for a while: it'll be the
> server-to-server traffic that will first peak. It's just going to =
take
> the client-server relationships years to catch up. Every time I look =
at
> my maillogs I've found there is quite a bit of v6 happening. But the
> web logs show almost nothing.
There was some additional research done by Geoff Houston indicating that =
if you exposed tunnel capable hosts (that were able to reach IPv6 =
literals) you had something closer to 20% IPv6 connectivity.
I'm already excited about traffic levels and patterns in less than 24 =
hours. Will be interesting to observe.
- Jared
See if you can reach this even if you don't have native IPv6=85
http://[2001:418:3f4::5]/=
