[141048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cablevision's company line on IPv6 to the home
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue May 31 01:53:54 2011
In-Reply-To: <5E16C911-B4B7-43BB-996B-D91DCC091B8E@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 01:53:41 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Greg Ihnen <os10rules@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Greg Ihnen <os10rules@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just got off the phone with a level 1 tech support guy about an issue with my parents Cablevision/Optimum Online service and decided to ask the fellow if there's any official company news about IPv6 being in the works. His comments
comments from techsupport aside.. the cablevision folks did have 2-3
folks at ARIN in ... SanJuan (I think?) who were very interested and
dedicated to pushing v6 to their consumer population. I think they (as
well as every other consumer provider) have a lot of challenges in the
last-mile architecture/etc, but they do seem dedicated to solving
things for users.
I think the gentlemen I ended up chatting with from CV was commenting
on PPML as well at the time... I'm sure a quick perusal of that list
would get you his POC info for queries... which are more likely to get
useful answers than nanog posts will.
-chris
