[140980] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wil Schultz)
Thu May 26 22:51:23 2011
In-Reply-To: <27A2757C-0B4E-4359-AA67-594F4B9CE27B@sensoryresearch.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 19:50:37 -0700
From: Wil Schultz <wschultz@bsdboy.com>
To: Jaime Magiera <jaime@sensoryresearch.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 26, 2011 3:08 PM, "Jaime Magiera" <jaime@sensoryresearch.net> wrote:
>
>
> <out of the woodwork>
> from our cold dead hands.
> </out of the woodwork>
>
> kd8mzn
>
I haven't read the entire thread, but since everyone with a call sign is
checking in...
There are some similarities between bands and ipv4 exhaustion, sure... One
major difference is that those using ipv4 have the option of using ipv6,
where if ham bands are taken they're just gone.
-73
af6ss
