[140972] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jaime Magiera)
Thu May 26 18:07:22 2011
From: Jaime Magiera <jaime@sensoryresearch.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=U9p7ZT-=wPL=T3A0MV774ttRBLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:07:09 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 26, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> I reckon it'd be about as hard to get back 44/8 as 11/8, but with more
> neckbeards. Anytime the fcc tries to reclaim frequencies all these =
guys come
> out of the wood work with the magic phrase 'emergency communications' =
and
> some congressmen get on their side about it.
>=20
> It will be amusing to see, yes.
<out of the woodwork>
from our cold dead hands.
</out of the woodwork>
kd8mzn