[140963] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Carrozzo)
Thu May 26 11:03:21 2011
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTiksPaTkANBKdeXqtNTof0i86Z4Wdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:03:13 -0400
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com>
To: Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Nope, mostly HF (under 30mhz) gear at 300baud. Yes, you read that right.
I've seen a couple shorter hops of fractional T1 on 900mhz or 9600baud AX.25
on 144mhz, but there just aren't enough links to use line of site
frequencies.
Push mad bits,
-Jack Carrozzo
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
> wrote:
> > You just need to move up in frequency a bit. My slowest ham-band link
> runs at 12 Mbps and my fastest at over 100 Mbps.
> >
> > Good reminder that I should renumber the IPv4 portion of that network to
> somewhere in 44.0.0.0/8 however.
>
> What hardware/frequencies/technology are you using for these links?
> Repurposed commercial microwave gear?
>
> -cjp
>
>