[140949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Hamelin)
Wed May 25 21:35:12 2011
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikA0_k_xufhgHtg1Woc=Sj0aBX5+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 18:34:31 -0700
From: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
To: Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net> wrote:
>
> Indeed, arbitrary is arbitrary, be it ham radio operators or the DoD.
> I was trolling hams on the list there, my apologies. FWIW, my box
> 44.68.16.20 hasn't been up in well over a decade. Would have been
> nice if that packet radio masses kept up with (or ahead of) the
> technology of the times. Our network went to 9600 baud user ports,
> then vanished.
>
>
>
DStar systems are using 44/8 now for interconnect. Mine (K7TUL/B) will be
up as soon as I make a hill trip and fix the antenna.
73
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
