[140935] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Pilkington)
Wed May 25 14:44:11 2011
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimtn8iVFTwGr+dhqFuN++vXZs00tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:43:24 -0400
From: Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>
To: Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon
<wavetossed@googlemail.com> wrote:
> So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to
> use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators
> that do not carry any DOD traffic and one could be that /8 from
> Softbank Japan, 126/8 if I recall it correctly. People who carry DOD
> traffic could borrow the APNIC block.
I recommend 44/8. Does it make sense that ham radio operators have
routable IP address space any longer? (Seems to be still advertised,
though.)
-cjp (n2mcs)
