[140913] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue May 24 23:46:53 2011
To: Jeremy <jbaino@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 May 2011 22:22:20 CDT."
<BANLkTimgbgd8sDwC_thYMXfzrta44vypPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:45:27 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1306295127_4707P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 24 May 2011 22:22:20 CDT, Jeremy said:
> As long as necessary precautions are taken (route filters, tunnels, VRF's)
> shouldn't this be technically feasible without any negative ramifications?
The types of network designers who are able to cover *every single* little
detail needed to make this sort of thing work are rarely the types of network
designers that would snarf up somebody else's prefix to use for this sort of
thing, and vice versa.
--==_Exmh_1306295127_4707P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFN3HtXcC3lWbTT17ARAuc5AKCQcOV1bfjifThKddwYFT+NBOsuGACgqLM2
bzqFKHYJ+VEwMUx6tpvztUE=
=XSIL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1306295127_4707P--
