[140899] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue May 24 19:32:15 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <B925B320C2655641ADBBFC00B1F0B82004754DB5@ukbb3.ukbroadband.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:31:06 -0700
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 18, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carl Rosevear [mailto:crosevear@skytap.com]
>>=20
>> "Eating Up" sounds so overweight and unhealthy. Since a good number
>> of us get paid for delivering bits, isn't this a good thing? Always
>> glad to see bits and dollars flowing into the Internet, personally.
>> However must express severe dissatisfaction with the topic of the
>> thread a while ago referencing Comcast trying to charge providers for
>> delivery over their network. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty happy
>> with the current model... even if it means a $5/month residential
>> rate hike (or something).
>>=20
>> --C
>>=20
>=20
> Well it depends if Netflix pay for the bandwidth they use or if they =
get
> it all for free with non settlement peering. If, suddenly, your =
business
> model breaks because of a huge demand for high bandwidth services by
> your customers then either you need to charge your customers more or
> Netflix (or whoever) need to share the pie.
Netflix is hosted in ec2 and they use a lot of CDN.
not sure that it's germain to the question of access to customers to =
measure which direction the money changes hands
> --
> Leigh Porter
>=20
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
>=20
>=20
