[140861] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Tue May 24 00:14:09 2011
In-Reply-To: <47B9E64B-8FF1-46BE-8E45-DD3CB7C3055B@ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:14:02 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wro=
te:
> On May 24, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think they have to hijack space from DoD. I think there are a
>>> number of other options available to them. They might cost more, but,
>>> they also come with somewhat lower risks
>>
>> the good thing is 7 exists on networks that will never see the light
>> of day... so it's just like 10! only lower and cooler! (and lucky, if
>> you believe the movies and all)
>
> It's not just whether those networks will ever leak 7. =A0It's whether th=
e DoD will ever announce anything in 7.
>
> If they do, any Rogers customer who wants to talk to it is screwed. =A0Wh=
ether they have a 7 addy or not, Rogers' routers will not let the packet le=
ave Rogers' borders.
>
Now, the onus is on the DoD to make its content available over unique
IPv6 space so that the Roger's customers can get to it using the
6to4-PMT solution. There is always a solution.
Cameron
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
>
