[140859] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue May 24 00:09:46 2011
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimG3+TXMZFJyhhuyDnZe2mNf39YiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:09:39 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 24, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> I don't think they have to hijack space from DoD. I think there are a
>> number of other options available to them. They might cost more, but,
>> they also come with somewhat lower risks
>=20
> the good thing is 7 exists on networks that will never see the light
> of day... so it's just like 10! only lower and cooler! (and lucky, if
> you believe the movies and all)
It's not just whether those networks will ever leak 7. It's whether the =
DoD will ever announce anything in 7.
If they do, any Rogers customer who wants to talk to it is screwed. =
Whether they have a 7 addy or not, Rogers' routers will not let the =
packet leave Rogers' borders.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
