[140851] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Mon May 23 15:44:53 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <61C559FA-FF52-46B2-8CB7-E6D9DD829DFD@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:44:33 -0700
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 23, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my iPad
>=20
> On May 23, 2011, at 11:32, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On May 23, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Mark Farina wrote:
>>> Is the DoD releasing this range to Rogers?
>>=20
>> Unlikely, although it might be an interesting case of testing ARIN's =
transfer policy if it was the case :-).
>>=20
>>> Or has Rogers squatted on this space due to exhaustion of their 10/8 =
use?
>>=20
>=20
> More likely they are making the assumption that their private internal =
use of the address
> space won't conflict with DoD's (apparently) private internal use of =
the address space.
if they're numbering cpe out of it they've also decided that breaking =
6to4 is no problem either, if they aren't then hey it's just more ipv4 =
ugliness, and there's alot more where that came from...
joel=
