[140849] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Mon May 23 12:32:18 2011

From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikYoyyO+3kX7V9rP8=VKqVhEECoug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:32:09 -0700
To: Mark Farina <markfarina76@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On May 23, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Mark Farina wrote:
> Is the DoD releasing this range to Rogers?

Unlikely, although it might be an interesting case of testing ARIN's =
transfer policy if it was the case :-).

> Or has Rogers squatted on this space due to exhaustion of their 10/8 =
use?

Probably. I've heard other large providers having similar issues =
(resulting in several attempts to designate more RFC 1918, all of which =
were all shot down).

> We've seen other vendors and ISP squat on previously unused ranges =
(the 1/8 or 5/8s).

Yes, however at the time those ISPs squatted on those addresses (and =
others), they had not yet been allocated by IANA pretty much =
guaranteeing there would be collisions when the IPv4 free pool was =
exhausted.  In this case, the block has been allocated yet doesn't =
appear to be in the routing system and I'm not sure it ever has been (at =
least authorized to be).  I'm guessing Rogers is making the assumption =
that the chances are probably small that one of their customers will =
need to communicate with a non-announced US DoD network.  I suspect they =
aren't the first to make this assumption.

> Could they not wrap their internal cable modem to node chatter in =
IPv6, instead of using assigned address space?

This would assume their deployed systems can support IPv6.  I suspect =
they have a few non-upgradeable systems/devices in their network and =
have chosen to squat on 7/8 rather than raise their rates to cover =
short-term upgrade costs (or deal with additional operational costs if =
they used multiple instances of 10/8).  But I'm just guessing...

Regards,
-drc



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post