[140687] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: user-relative names - was:[Re: Yahoo and IPv6]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue May 17 23:22:33 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110517195139.B96C78DD@resin16.mta.everyone.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:22:23 -0700
To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 17, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>=20
>=20
> --- joelja@bogus.com wrote:
> From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
>=20
>> if you put something in the dns you do so because you want to =
discovered. scoping the nameservers such that they only express certain =
certain resource records to queriers in a particular scope is fairly =
straight forward.
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>=20
>>=20
>> The article was not about DNS. It was about "Persistent Personal =
Names for Globally Connected Mobile Devices" where "Users normally =
create personal names by introducing devices locally, on a common WiFi =
network for example. Once created, these names remain persistently bound =
to their targets as devices move. Personal names are intended to =
supplement and not replace global DNS names." =20
>=20
> you mean like mac addresses? those have a tendency to follow you =
around in ipv6...
> -----------------------------------------
>=20
>=20
>=20
> <disclaimer>=20
> Still an IPv6 wussie... :-)=20
> </disclaimer> =20
>=20
>=20
> Only if you design your network that way. EUI-64 isn't required.
don't much matter, if you move around you're going get them a lot.
> scott
>=20
