[140675] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: user-relative names - was:[Re: Yahoo and IPv6]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue May 17 19:40:40 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=rj86s6FDKu9UAzOfdDM4WOmtdtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:39:46 -0700
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 17, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> On May 17, 2011 6:26 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>>=20
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
>>=20
>>> What about privacy concerns
>>=20
>> "Privacy is dead. Get used to it." -- Scott McNeely
>=20
> Forget that attitude, Valdis. Just because privacy is blown at one =
level
> doesn't mean you give it away at every other one. We establish the =
framework
> for recovering privacy and make progress step by step, wherever we =
can.
> Someday we'll get it all back under control.
if you put something in the dns you do so because you want to =
discovered. scoping the nameservers such that they only express certain =
certain resource records to queriers in a particular scope is fairly =
straight forward.
> Scott
>=20
