[140631] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon May 16 03:37:10 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DD0A03B.5080906@matthew.at>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 00:31:07 -0700
To: matthew@matthew.at
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 15, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will =
just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64 =
networks you're building, I suppose?
>>>=20
>>> Matthew Kaufman
>> Uh, BitTorrent works just fine for me on IPv6.
>=20
> And how many v4-only nodes are you reaching from your v6-only client =
through a NAT64?
>=20
> Matthew Kaufman
I have dual stack, so, I don't bother with NAT64. However, I believe =
that the BitTorrent clients
are smart enough to discard the IPv4 nodes reached through NAT64 and =
will, instead, just
use the native IPv6 nodes. I don't see this as a problem and I"m not =
sure why you do.
Owen
