[140625] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun May 15 22:13:18 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCFF136.8040102@matthew.at>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 19:08:40 -0700
To: matthew@matthew.at
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>> On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew@matthew.at =
<mailto:matthew@matthew.at>> wrote:
>> >
>>=20
>> >
>> > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk =
to SIP phones on an IP4-only network.
>> >
>>=20
>> Right, that is why we have SBC / b2bue for the cases we want to work.
>>=20
>=20
> Ok, so you concede that NAT64 requires yet another device at the edge =
to make the SIP phones work...
>>=20
>>=20
>> We have agreed to disagree on the value of this before. Sorry your =
not so popular protocol is going the way of EGP .... it's just not fit =
for the evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I =
am sure you will disagree with that and insist every end user must =
always support ipv4 because rtmfp is top of mind for so many users .... =
but we can leave it at that ....please
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will =
just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64 =
networks you're building, I suppose?
>=20
> Matthew Kaufman
Uh, BitTorrent works just fine for me on IPv6.
Owen
